|
EXPOSURE
LETTERS
FOUR LETTERS FOUND
Four letters
laden with Anthrax spores were discovered, all dated by an unknown
author as "09-11-01," and all sent from Trenton, New Jersey.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) believes all four of the anthrax
letters came from a single individual (i.e.,
Dr. Bruce Ivins -- see "Perpetrator" in left column) and were of the "Ames" strain. Two of the letters were postmarked September 18, 2001
in Trenton,
one of which was sent to the New York Post (shown
below) where it was handled by several staff members, and the other to Tom Brokaw of NBC,
opened September 19-25 but not found until October 12, 2001 in
case 2's file drawer
(shown
below). The New York Post letter, handled but not opened, was found
on October 19, 2001. It was dampened before being discovered, turning
the spore contents into a granular or clumped state.
The second two letters were postmarked on October 9,
2001 and mailed to the Washington DC offices of Senator
Tom Daschle of
North Carolina, Majority Leader (route shown at left,
letter shown below)
and Senator Patrick Leahy
of Vermont, Chair of the Judiciary Committee (shown
below, envelope only). Both letters
went though Washington DC's Brentwood mail processing facility, which
handles all incoming federal government mail (see map,
2). Both letters contained the same anthrax strain and were of
the same potency.
The Daschle letter was opened in the sixth floor office at 9:45 am by an aide in the
Senator's Hart Senate Office Building suite on October 15, 2001. It
was believed to contain about 2 grams of powder comprised of 200
billion to 2 trillion spores. Based on nasal swabs, all
18 persons who were in the area of Daschle's sixth floor office tested
positive for anthrax exposure, as did 7 of 25 (i.e, 28%) in the area of the
Senator's fifth floor office (an open staircase connected the two offices).
The Leahy letter never arrived at his office.
Instead an optical reader
misread the hand-written 20510 ZIP code for the Capitol as 20520, which
serves the State Department. As a result, the letter was routed to the
State Department, where it arrived on October 15, infecting a State
Department postal worker (case
20). Shortly thereafter, all mail was isolated and sealed in
plastic bags for a latter search.
On November 16, 2001, the Leahy letter was found, then after special
preparation, was opened on December 6 in a laboratory setting (see
photo). It contained about about one
gram of anthrax, made fresh no more than two years before it was sent.
The contents of the enclosed letter were identical to the
wording of the Daschle letter. The
anthrax spores in the Daschle and Leahy envelopes were uniformly between 1
and 3 microns in size.
More investigation is underway.
Also
processed at the Trenton, New Jersey postal facility
was a small number of letters sent to the Southern Connecticut Processing and
Distribution Center in Wallingford, Connecticut (see map).
Here letters arrived on October 11 that had been cross-contaminated with anthrax
spores from the October 9 Daschle or Leahy envelops. Anthrax
spores were found on mail-sorting equipment (see photo)
in Wallingford.
One letter that went through the Wallingford distribution center was found in
Seymour (see map), nearby to Oxford (see
map) where case 23
resided. Likely case 23 was infected via a similar cross-contaminated letter
that came in contact with mail in the distribution center in Wallingford (not
discovered).
Most
uncertain is the origin of case 22,
although there is a connection between case 22's neighborhood and the Trenton,
N.J. post office. A printout from the post office showed that an unrelated
letter went to a shop around the corner from case 22's home. This
unrelated letter was processed two minutes after the Leahy letter and 18 minutes
before the Daschle letter. Thus the mail sent to case 22 might also have been
cross-contaminated with spores from the Leahy or Daschle envelops. Alternatively, case 22 might have had
contact with one or more of the unrecovered September 18th letters following
their disposal in Manhattan, similar to
case 19 and
case 21. Click
here for a graph of
possible exposure sources for case 22.
Many months later on March 1, 2002, a final case of cutaneous
anthrax arose in Texas in one of several private laboratories contracted by CDC
to analyzed the multitude of environmental samples that emanated from the
contaminated letters (addenda).
The lab worker cut himself while shaving, the next day handled an anthrax specimen
without gloves, and touched the anthrax spores to his chin.
SEVEN LETTERS SENT
The person (likely Dr. Bruce Ivins) who caused the outbreak probably mailed seven
letters containing anthrax spores and similar written messages from Trenton, New
Jersey. Five of the letters were sent on September 18 (postal
facilities, cases 3,
4 [probable
cross-contamination]), one going to
American Media in Boca Raton, Florida (cases
5 and
7) (not recovered);
a second to the New York Post (cases
1,
19,
21) (recovered); a third
to Tom Brokaw of NBC News
(cases 2,
6) (recovered);
a fourth to ABC News (case 8) (not
recovered); and a fifth to Dan Rather of CBS News (case
9) (not recovered). On October 9, two more
letters were sent from Trenton, N.J. (cases
10,
11,
12,
13,
18 [probably
cross-contamination]) via Brentwood mail processing facility
(cases
14,
15,
16,
17), one to Senator Tom Daschle (recovered) and the other to Senator
Patrick Leahy (case 20) (recovered).
Letter(s) cross-contaminated with the Daschle and Leahy letters were sent from
Trenton, N.J. to Wallingford, CT, with at least one letter probably going to Oxford, CT
(case
23). The final anthrax
case in the outbreak remains a
mystery, but possibly arose from contact with the September 18 letters or cross-contamination with the October 9 Leahy letter in Trenton, New
Jersey. To do so, spores from the Leahy letter would need to have adhered to an envelop
of another letter destined for the Bronx, New York City (case 22).
In summary, the 22 cases (one was removed by CDC) that comprised the American Anthrax
Outbreak of 2001 likely had contact with one or more of seven spore-laden
envelopes. A final case, bringing the total to 23 but not considered by
Professor Frerichs to be part of the initial outbreak (see addenda), occurred months later in a Texas laboratory
worker following direct contact with a vial of anthrax spores.
Click for news account of New York Post anthrax letter (10/21/01)
Click for news account of Ames strain in letters (10/26/01)
Click for description of Ames strain and
weaponizing
procedure (11/12/02)
Click for news account of problems with envelope content analysis (11/29/01)
Click for speculation on spore seepage through envelops (11/30/01)
Click for news account of cross-contaminated mail in Connecticut (12/1/01)
Click for news account of fumigation done in Daschle's office (12/2/01)
Click for news account of cross-contamination in Wallingford, Conn.
(12/2/01)
Click for news account of cross-contamination in Bronx, New York City
(12/3/01)
Click for news account of new thoughts about anthrax exposure (12/3/01)
Click for news account of letter connections in the Bronx (12/4/01)
Click for news account of opening of Leahy letter (12/7/01)
Click for news account of letter-tracking process (12/7/01)
Click for MMWR account of Brentwood postal facility anthrax testing
(12/21/01)
Click for news account of difficulties with anthrax spore investigation
(12/27/01)
Click for news account of over-looked studies on cross-contamination (2/11/02)
Click for news account of planned Brentwood postal facility cleanup
(3/26/02)
Click for
follow-up of Texas laboratory worker (4/4/02)
Click for
FBI characterization of anthrax in Leahy letter
(4/8/02)
Click for
news of unusual coating of anthrax in Leahy letter
(4/11/02)
Click for or news account of planned Hamilton postal facility cleanup (4/12/02)
Click for news account of likely Wallingford, Conn. cross-contamination (5/1/01)
Click for news account of laboratory analysis of letters (5/7/01)
Click for theory on role of mail sorting equipment (5/9/02)
Click for theory on few spores needed for cross-contamination (5/14/02)
Click for brief FBI update on content of anthrax letters (5/18/02)
Click for
CDC case designation of Texas laboratory worker (6/7/02)
Click for
news account of planned Hamilton postal facility cleanup (6/10/02)
Click for
news account of Brentwood postal facility cleanup (6/14/02)
Click for
news account of people in Hamilton Township, NJ postal area (6/23/02)
Click for
news of possible health effects of irradiating mail (7/2/02)
Click for
news account of irradiating mail sent to Washington DC (7/29/02)
Click for
news account of past developments (9/02/02)
Click for
news account of past developments (9/18/02)
Click for
one-year follow-up of anthrax outbreak - part one (10/7/02)
Click for
one-year follow-up of anthrax outbreak - part two (10/8/02)
Click for news of coating of anthrax spores (10/28/02)
Click for news account of FBI's use of "reverse engineering" of anthrax (11/2/02)
Click for news account of immune response to anthrax in Daschle letter (11/12/02)
Click for news account of vaporizing quality of anthrax spores in office
environment (12/10/02)
Click for dramatic account of early cases and 16 month follow-up (3/03)
Click for news account of cleanup of Brentwood postal facility (5/18/03)
Click for two-year follow-up of anthrax survivors (9/18/03)
Click for new information on two distinct varieties of anthrax in mailed
letters (7/4/04)
Click for reopening of NJ postal building after three and a half years
(3/14/05)
Click for anthrax-free declaration of AMI building in Florida after five years
(2/8/07)
Click for follow-up of various cases nearly seven years later -1
(8/2/08)
Click for follow-up of various cases nearly seven years later -2
(8/2/08)
Click for follow-up of various cases nearly seven years later -3
(8/7/08)
Click for follow-up of various cases nearly seven years later -4
(8/7/08)
Click for follow-up of various cases nearly seven years later -5
(8/7/08)
Click for follow-up of various cases nearly seven years later -6
(8/7/08)
Details on exposure to the letters is included with
information on each case.
PERPETRATOR WHO SENT ENVELOPES
While CDC epidemiologists have been able to solve the
biological aspects of the detective drama, the person who mailed the
anthrax-containing envelopes remained free until July 29, 2008 when Dr. Bruce
Ivins, the likely perpetrator, committed suicide . The FBI and detective colleagues
published description information and theories over time, and gradually closed in on
the guilty party, nearly seven years after the letters were mailed.
Click for FBI assessment of person(s) who wrote anthrax letters (11/9/01)
Click for news account of FBI letter-writer theory (11/10/01)
Click for news account of FBI's search for the anthrax-spreading criminal
(12/2/01)
Click for news account of other theories of anthrax-spreading criminal
(12/2/01)
Click for news account of Anthrax
linked to type made by U.S.
(12/03/01)
Click for compilation of evidence and prediction of perpetrator(s)
(12/10/01)
Click for news account of on-going CDC and FBI investigations (12/11/01)
Click for news account of Anthrax link to U.S. Army (USAMRIID) (12/16/01)
Click for news account of FBI focus on labs
(12/19/01)
Click for news account of FBI focus on motives
(12/21/01)
Click for news account of FBI focus on domestic connection
(12/22/01)
Click for news account of speculation on perpetrator
(12/23/01)
Click for op-ed speculation on identity of perpetrator (1/4/02)
Click for news account of various theories on perpetrator (1/6/02)
Click for news account of FBI photocopy investigation (1/15/02)
Click for news account of
staffers of labs investigation (1/18/02)
Click for FBI view of central New Jersey connection (1/23/02)
Click for FBI contact of scientists for clues (1/29/02)
Click for FBI strategy in lab component of investigation (2/7/02)
Click for FBI suspicion of military labs (2/12/02)
Click for use of Anthrax markers to identify lab (2/13/02)
Click for news account of on-going FBI investigation (2/22/02)
Click for news account of FBI suspect (2/25/02)
Click for FBI denial of rumored suspect (2/25/02)
Click for news account of continuing FBI investigation (2/26/02)
Click for news account of FBI lab subpoenas (2/27/02)
Click for FBI director's comments on pace of investigation
(3/2/02)
Click for news account of FBI progress (3/3/02)
Click for perpetrator theories summarized by Newsnight, BBC
(3/14/02)
Click for possible Anthrax link with September 11 hijackers
(3/23/02)
Click for FBI review of path to evidence (3/25/02)
Click for FBI discussion of investigation with general public (3/26/02)
Click for news account of frustrations with
unsolved anthrax mystery (4/15/02)
Click for scientists' deductions on Anthrax killer
(4/21/02)
Click for review and critique of
Anthrax investigation so far (4/29/02)
Click for FBI plans to polygraph
government workers (5/21/02)
Click for FBI investigation of
Ft. Detrick involvement (6/13/02)
Click for problems with anthrax genetic analysis (6/19/02)
Click for FBI assessment that Anthrax was newly made (6/23/02)
Click for news media summary of FBI anthrax investigation (7/10/02)
Click for news media account of CDC and FBI anthrax investigation (7/23/02)
Click for FBI investigation of potential suspect (8/2/02)
Click for review of FBI investigation of potential suspect (8/10/02)
Click for response of potential suspect to FBI investigation (8/11/02)
Click for follow-up and frustrations of FBI investigation (10/1/02)
Click for summary of theories and on-going outbreak investigation (11/17/02)
Click for thoughts about perpetrator(s) of CDC director (12/9/02)
Click for news of FBI investigation of "person of interest" (12/23/02)
Click for news of on-going FBI investigation pointing to domestic source (4/11/03)
Click for article that questions if FBI rushed to judgment (4/15/03)
Click for news of FBI pond finds and water lab theory (5/11/03)
Click for two-year update of FBI investigation (9/14/03)
Click for 2.75-year update of FBI investigation (5/16/04)
Click for three year update on the anthrax investigation (11/21/04)
Click for four year update on FBI anthrax investigation
(9/16/05)
Click for five year update on the FBI anthrax investigation (11/3/06)
Click for law suit declaring innocence of FBI "person of interest" (1/12/08)
Click for US government settlement with FBI's "person of interest" (6/28/08)
Click for summary of troubled FBI investigation of "person of interest" (6/29/08)
Click for opinion of how the FBI "botched" the anthrax investigation (6/30/08)
Click for opinion of how the FBI "botched" the anthrax investigation (6/30/08)
Click for apparent suicide of anthrax suspect (8/1/08)
Click for potential motive of anthrax suspect (8/2/08)
Click for personal profile of family and friends of Bruce Ivins (8/2/08)
Click for FBI trail that led to Bruce E. Ivins (8/4/08)
Click for Ft. Detrick security clearance of Bruce Ivins (8/4/08)
Click for pressure on FBI to produce anthrax evidence (8/5/08)
Click for reported mental status of Bruce Ivins (8/6/08)
Click for additional details on anthrax suspect given by FBI (8/7/08)
Click for FBI information that Ivins acted alone (8/7/08)
Click for revelations on mental status of Ivins (8/7/08)
Click for summary of FBI evidence against Bruce Ivins (8/7/08)
Click for personal views of Ivins given at funeral service (8/10/08)
Click for review of how Ivins historically slipped under FBI radar (8/15/08)
Click for FBI press conference on evidence against Bruce Ivins (8/19/08)
Click for link of anthrax spores to source flask RMR-1029 held by Ivins (8/21/08)
Click for FBI roundtable discussion with reporters of Ivins evidence (8/24/08)
|