POSTING 35: FINDING SOLUTIONS TO HIV 


about Epidemiology & the department

Epidemiology academic information

Epidemiology faculty

Epidemilogy resources

sites of interest to Epidemiology professionals



Frerichs, R.R. Finding solutions to HIV in the developing world.

SEA-AIDS Network, April 24, 1998.

R.R. Frerichs Posting

This past weekend, experts from 38 countries came to San Francisco to participate in a workshop on ways to prevent HIV transmission in developing countries. The first report of the meeting appeared in today's San Francisco Chronicle (see below). Unfortunately the article does not suggest that much new will come out of this meeting. Rather than seeking working models of successful programs for replication in other settings, the focus of the workshop seems to have been on the need for money to support on-going efforts, as if cost-effective solutions are already known. 

It is not clear that any attention was paid to unraveling the reasons why some developing countries have very low rates of infection while the virus flourishes in others, to identifying the successful elements in Cuba's HIV program or other countries that have kept the virus at a low level, or even viewing the experiences of groups like the US military with their comprehensive detection and treatment program.

At the biological level, we look for examples of natural resistance to HIV to offer clues on how best to attack the virus. While there are not many resistant persons, those who have been identified are highly valued by researchers. Such pragmatism has helped medical and biological investigators understand more about the virus and eventually to develop more effective therapies.

We need to do the same at the cultural level, seeing what does and does not work in various national settings.

Why has Cuba been so successful? Why do Indonesia and the Philippines have such apparent low rates? Why is the virus inapparent in many middle-eastern countries but exploding in Russia? Why is HIV at high levels among some South Africans, but exists at much lower levels in others?

There is much to be learned by studying societies and cultures that have avoided infection, but such study must be done with an open mind, and should not be constrained by examples of social failure. Our biomedical colleagues do not spend endless time lamenting that most people are not resistant to the virus. Instead they find the few that are resistant in a natural setting and learn from them.


"AIDS rampages through developing world"

By Lisa M. Krieger (San Francisco Examiner, April 22, 1998)

Cheap and simple interventions could significantly slow the AIDS epidemic in the developing world, but even these modest prevention tools are financially out of reach of beleaguered nations, according to experts at a UC-San Francisco-sponsored AIDS conference.

"We know what works. We've shown it's effective. What we need now is the money to implement them," said Martha Bulter deLister, director of the Dominican Republic AIDS organization Fundacion Genesis. "We can't wait for a vaccine," she said.

If affluent governments, corporations and individuals dug deeper and spent 10 to 15 times more on global prevention programs, the number of new HIV infections could be reduced by as much as half, according to United Nations calculations presented at the three-day meeting.

Hard-hit regions

HIV infection is rampaging through Africa, the Caribbean, Latin America and Southeast Asia, but many countries are unable to afford something as simple as a blood test to keep their blood supply clean. Nor can they afford testing and counseling of HIV-infected people to warn against transmitting the infection to others. And sexually transmitted diseases, known to boost the risk of HIV infection, go untreated.

Furthermore, mothers pass on the virus to their infants because they lack access to the brief AZT drug regimen that could interrupt deadly viral transmission. While much of the globe is riveted by fancy three-and four-drug anti-viral regimens, costing $25,000 to $37,000 per person a year, an estimated 16,000 men, women and children in developing countries are newly infected each day.

Conference co-chair Margaret Chesney of the UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, working with AIDS specialists from 38 different nations, sought practical and affordable solutions to the growing epidemic. They estimated that it costs 50 cents to test blood for the AIDS virus. Several dollars to cure a sexually transmitted disease. $50 to give an infected mother a short course of AZT to prevent transmission of the virus to her baby. Worldwide, about $1.5 billion has been spent each year on comic books, radio spots and condom rallies in developing nations. But such prevention efforts have proved to be mere speed bumps, not roadblocks, in the path of HIV.

Supplies are limited

Blood testing is the official "standard of care" in most nations, but that is no assurance that it actually happens. Some nations, such as Uganda and Kenya, have a supply of blood-testing kits -- but then use them up, and run out. In other nations, the kits are available in the capital, but not rural regions. Pharmaceutical companies should help serve the communities that volunteer for drug and vaccine testing, the experts urged. And multinational corporations that do business in poor nations should consider contributing to the anti-HIV effort. Without effective AIDS prevention, the countries' "work force would be wiped out . . . their talent would be wiped out," said Thomas J. Coates, director of the UCSF AIDS Research Institute and workshop co-chair.

The disparity between rich and poor nations has increased dramatically over the course of the epidemic.

In 1980, about twice as many adults were infected in sub-Saharan Africa as in North America. Today, 14 times as many are infected there. The cumulative number of HIV infections among adults around the world has more than doubled from about 10 million in 1990 to almost 25.5 million by mid-1996. HIV has disproportionately devastated the developing world. In 1996, 93 percent of HIV-infected people were in the the developing world.

Return to INTERNATIONAL CONTROVERSIES