Health Impact Assessment - Information & Insight for Policy Decisions

Home
Contact Us

HomeArchiveHIA GuideHIA NewsLinksAbout Us

Related Info.
Pathways
  • nutrition (forthcoming)
  • physical activity
  • economics (forthcoming)
  • social capital
  • health services (forthcoming)
  • mobility (forthcoming)

    Sectors
  • agriculture (forthcoming)
  • planning (forthcoming)

    Methods/Tools
  • descriptive (forthcoming)
  • population health statistics (forthcoming)
  • census



  • HIA Archive : San Francisco Eastern Neighborhoods Rezoning and Area Plans Environment Impact Report

    San Francisco Eastern Neighborhoods Rezoning and Area Plans Environment Impact Report
    Authors: San Francisco Department of Public Health
    Date: 2007

    Links
    HIA Report:
         
    Background Reports:
         [Citation and link to full HIA (may be internal or external)]
         [Name of Institution (Hperlinked)]

    Contact
        

    San Francisco Department of Public Health

     


    Summary of the HIA *

    Policy or Project
    The Eastern Neighborhoods Community Health Impact Assessment (ENCHIA) was developed to act on growing scientific understanding that optimal health cannot be achieved by improving health services or individual behavior change alone. Advancing healthful neighborhood conditions such as: adequate housing; access to public transit, schools, parks, and public spaces; safe routes for pedestrians and bicyclists; productive employment; unpolluted environments, and civil participation was the overarching goal of this project.

    Background ** and Policy Context
    ENCHIA was an 18-month process convened to asses the health benefits and burdens of development in several San Francisco neighborhoods, including the Mission, South of Market, and Potrero Hill.  Convened and facilitated by the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH), ENCHIA was guided by a multi-stakeholder Community Council of over 20 diverse organizations whose interests were affected by development.  Members of the Council represented a number of broad interests, including community planning and design, economic and neighborhood development, environmental justice, homelessness, open space, housing, transportation, bicycle advocacy, low-wage and union workers, food systems, child care and childhood development, non-profit and private developers, property-owners, architects and small businesses.

    Scope and Methods
    The ENCHIA  planning committee sustained dialogue in a Community Council structure using collaborative, consensus-based decision-making methods; the Council was to determine the content and focus of the HIA; while the SFDPH’s role was to guide and staff the assessment process, gather data, conduct research, and produce group products; all products to be reviewed, critiqued, and amended based on Council deliberation.

    The Project goals were to:

    1.  Collectively identify and analyze the likely impacts of land use plans and zoning controls on community concerns, including housing, jobs and public infrastructure;
    2.  Provide recommendations for land use policies and zoning controls that promoted community priorities;
    3.  Promote meaningful public involvement and consensus in land use policy-making;
    4.  Develop capacity for inter-agency working relationships; and
    5.  Illustrate the feasibility of HIA methods

    Expected products include:

    • Consensus positions on the health resources needed from the Eastern Neighborhoods planning;
    • Recommendations for land use controls, policies, and design strategies to promote and protect health through planning and zoning;
    • Monitoring indicators to track long-term progress toward healthy development.

    Summary of findings
    The ENCHIA process was successful in a number of significant ways.  It broadened participant understanding of how development affects health, built new relationships among participants, and created a practical tool for evaluating land use plans and projects.  ENCHIA also showed that a government-led public process could sustain diverse participation, employ consensus techniques, and shift participant focus from problems to solutions.

     


    Updated 6/23/2009

    * The HIA-CLIC website and this summary were developed by the UCLA Health Impact Assessment (UCLA-HIA) Project with support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.  Every effort has been made to ensure that these summaries are factually accurate.  HIA authors have been given an opportunity to review summaries before posting.  HIA authors may notify us of any factual inaccuracies or updates by filling out a Request for Update form (click for pop-up form).

    ** Readers interested in more detail, including literature citations, for the background summarized here are encouraged to view the full HIA report (see external link above), or to review the relevant Pathway section of HIA-CLIC.



    Home | Archive | HIA Guide | Pathways | Sectors | Methods | HIA News | Links | About Us | Contact Us
    © 2009 UCLA School of Public Health